Commentaries On Mat 22 31 32

Now there were with us seven brothers.

Commentaries on mat 22 31 32.

And restores the ancient sense of it in which only it was to be understood. But with reference to the resurrection set over against the foregoing ἐν γὰρ τῇ ἀναστ. 31 32 jesus interprets the law concerning divorce. But in st paul s sense romans 14 9 he is the god of the dead.

We have all encountered the troubling passage in matthew 12 31 32 which indicates that there is a sin which the grace of god does not cover. The same day the sadducees who say there is no resurrection came to him and asked him saying. What does matthew 22 32 mean. God is not the god of the dead that is in the sadducees sense utterly dead and extinct for ever.

For a divorce was allowable in no case. 23 28 the sadducees attempt to ridicule the idea of the resurrection. Matthew 22 31 32new international version niv 31 but about the resurrection of the dead have you not read what god said to you 32 i am the god of abraham the god of isaac and the god of jacob a. Matthew 22 31 matthew 22 33 read matthew 22 32.

That whosoever shall put away his wife c christ does not infringe or revoke the original grant or permission of divorce. The sin mentioned in this passage is often referred to as the unpardonable sin or unforgivable sin. I am the god of abraham and the god of isaac and the god.

In focusing on the command to love god and our neighbor we will rightly understand the demands and details of the law matthew 22 37 40. Only frees it from the false interpretations and ill use the pharisees made of it. The sequence of the address is indicated by the prepositions. Matthew 12 31 32 is often pointed to as proof that we can lose our salvation.

Teacher moses said that if a man dies having no children his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother. Verses 31 32 make it clear that the tax collectors and prostitutes are the first son ultimately obedient and the chief priests and elders are the second son ultimately disobedient. He is not the god of the dead but of the living. David guzik commentary on matthew 5 where jesus teaches the sermon on the mount to the disciples including the beatitudes.

Should be taken along with οὐκ ἀνέγνωτε. God of abraham note in this connection the repetition of the divine name before each of the patriarchal names and here the article ὁ before θεὸς each time not so in sept 126.